Transpired he endured defeat by Grimsby. Survive an important European final against one of the worst Tottenham teams in living memory. He withstood home defeats to domestic rivals, finishing 15th, the tactical inflexibility, squandering the team's most promising academy products, a poor winning percentage, calling his team the poorest the club has ever seen. Yet, there existed a single opponent with whom the Portuguese coach would not be allowed to dance. You come at the sporting director, you had better succeed.
Regrettably, like many a Premiership right-back in Blackburn’s title-winning 1994-95 season, the coach took on Jason Wilcox and seems to have missed. Even the most casual observer will notice the paradoxical situation: a coach who frequently berated his squad for failing in one-on-one duels succumbing when confronted by the intense pressure and formidable presence of one of England's top division's most feared football executives.
And frankly, this entire painful saga appears to portray the director in a whole new light. It may have been tempting, given his brief stint of experience with the Saints, to view him as merely a drudge within the club's structure: a man whose appointment was due as much to his friendship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada rather than any verifiable talent. How wrong everyone was. By masterfully outsmarting United’s feted head coach, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate a previous executive before him, he has demonstrated as one of the sport’s strategic masterminds: a strategic mind of which United’s competitors are now justifiably concerned.
To illustrate, this was Jason Wilcox who having been part of the leadership that appointed the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach in the first place, played a key role in trying to persuade him to abandon his favored formation. Unsurprisingly, these entreaties met a certain resistance. But perhaps such directives hold greater authority when delivered from the mouth with the unimpeachable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, holder of three England caps and a contributor to a title-winning side from 31 years ago.
Maybe eventually Jason Wilcox may be persuaded to outline his reasoning publicly. Maybe one day questions may arise why Amorim is departing with a full payout, without any penalty clause activated. The director speaks rarely publicly, for excellent reasons. The true intellectuals in football – men like him – function on a plane exceeding our prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, most likely we would perceive would be ultrasonic blips and four-dimensional whirring. Desiring an explanation is not quite the same as being prepared to comprehend it.
Naturally, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we overlook the real power behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, in reality, merely executing the directives of his superior Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who in private has emphasized his preference for a back four. According to reports, Ratcliffe has also proposed playing Bryan Mbeumo as a right wing-back. Ratcliffe is keen for United to embrace analytics and analytics. According to ESPN, in an executive meeting soon after his minority ownership, he declared that the team's approach of play “shall be determined in this room”.
After all, Sir Jim is a specialist in this technical football matters, leveraging his previous experience in petrochemicals and yachting. Above all he remains incredibly rich, and as we all know, the rich are the best of us: more insightful, more wise, strategically brilliant, simply superior. Who else could one trust to manage an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the construction of a new stadium that looks a lot like an abstract design, the acquisition of a new striker?
This is a trend that is becoming prevalent in top-tier of the game. Historically, clubs foolishly entrusted major sporting choices to subordinate staff like managers, scouts – players themselves. Maybe previously possible for an up-and-coming, innovative manager with a philosophy and energy to go into an organization and see their vision supported to fruition. Yet how many companies have such individuals set up? What number of mass redundancies have they managed? Far preferable to invest the real power where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the open-necked shirt brigade, the guys with the jaw-dropping professional resumes. Better by far to determine the strategy by the directors and hire a coach who can tailor their methods accordingly. If managers were formerly chefs, they have become more like delivery personnel: not creating the food, yet ultimately answerable should it be delivered poorly or fails to meet standards.
Nowadays, their job is increasingly not about crafting the philosophy and more about selling it: the front-facing representative of the operation, the visible figurehead for a club they have minimal power to change. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of very young players into Europe and wins domestic cups, and effectively is dismissed for talking. Wilfried Nancy sees his reputation ruined while those individuals who appointed him live to blunder indefinitely.
And perhaps on some microcosmic level this is simply neoliberalism at work: the elevation of a gilded elite who can never be wrong, whose decisions remain sacrosanct, whose mistakes can invariably be sacked away without justification. Appoint the system coach and then fire them for playing excessively that system. Hire the process guy and later discard them for requiring excessive time. And above all show gratitude; for your modest season ticket price rises, for the latest summer signings, for the fact that the adults – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.
Giornalista freelance con 10 anni di esperienza, specializzata in divulgazione scientifica e innovazione tecnologica.